<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How long can a text link be if it should improve your rankings?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itsabhik.com/keyword/maximum-keyword-length.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itsabhik.com/keyword/maximum-keyword-length.html</link>
	<description>My Roads to Make Money Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 14:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name Generators Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.itsabhik.com/keyword/maximum-keyword-length.html#comment-3253</link>
		<dc:creator>Name Generators Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsabhik.com/?p=298#comment-3253</guid>
		<description>Cool research and some interesting figures.

Do you recommend to go to closer to the  limit and stuff more keyword in the link texts?

I normally keep my anchor texts down to a shorter keyword string. Seems logical  that each word in a short string will get a relative higher &quot;weight&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool research and some interesting figures.</p>
<p>Do you recommend to go to closer to the  limit and stuff more keyword in the link texts?</p>
<p>I normally keep my anchor texts down to a shorter keyword string. Seems logical  that each word in a short string will get a relative higher &#8220;weight&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joomla Expert</title>
		<link>http://www.itsabhik.com/keyword/maximum-keyword-length.html#comment-2234</link>
		<dc:creator>Joomla Expert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsabhik.com/?p=298#comment-2234</guid>
		<description>Nice information, and you have suggested well. Your recommendation are reliable and adoptable. But I think Google consider 66 characters for title, 150 characters for description and about 10 keywords for keyword length.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice information, and you have suggested well. Your recommendation are reliable and adoptable. But I think Google consider 66 characters for title, 150 characters for description and about 10 keywords for keyword length.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunita Biddu</title>
		<link>http://www.itsabhik.com/keyword/maximum-keyword-length.html#comment-2145</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunita Biddu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itsabhik.com/?p=298#comment-2145</guid>
		<description>Indeed agreed. Good test Abhi. You could include the point of timeduration as well though.. to achieve rankings. Like how long it may take the link to contribute to rankings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed agreed. Good test Abhi. You could include the point of timeduration as well though.. to achieve rankings. Like how long it may take the link to contribute to rankings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: www.itsabhik.com @ 2012-02-10 08:25:01 by W3 Total Cache -->
